ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Differential effects of nAChR modulators on impulsive action in a nicotine self-administration Go/No-Go task in rats.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Tobacco use disorder is a chronic condition characterized by compulsive nicotine use, withdrawal, and relapse following abstinence. Impulsivity contributes to persistent nicotine use and poor cessation outcomes. This study examined whether nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) modulators alter impulsive action in a nicotine self-administration Go/No-Go task in male and female rats. Methods: Rats acquired intravenous nicotine self-administration and were then trained in a Go/No-Go procedure in which active lever presses were reinforced during Go periods but not during No-Go periods. Impulsive action was quantified as the percentage of active lever responses during No-Go periods relative to total active responses. We then assessed the effects of varenicline (0.1-3 mg/kg), nicotine (0.1-0.6 mg/kg), and the nAChR antagonist mecamylamine (0.5-2 mg/kg) in the Go/No-Go procedure. Results: Varenicline and nicotine pretreatment reduced active responding during both Go and No-Go periods, whereas mecamylamine selectively reduced responding during No-Go periods. Mecamylamine decreased the percentage of active responses during No-Go trials, indicating reduced impulsive action during nicotine self-administration. In contrast, nicotine and varenicline did not alter response allocation, suggesting that their effects reflected nonspecific reductions in responding rather than changes in impulsive action. No sex differences were observed. Substituting saline for nicotine during self-administration did not alter active responding during Go periods, but rats in the saline group had fewer active responses during No-Go periods than rats in the nicotine group. Discussion: These results demonstrate differential effects of nAChR modulators on impulsive action during nicotine self-administration. This work supports the utility of Go/No-Go self-administration task for investigating nAChR-dependent modulation of impulsive action during nicotine self-administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.