ArticleJournal of transplantation2026
Three Decades of Living Liver Donor Outcomes: A National Cohort Analysis of Patterns in Mortality and Recovery.
Article in Journal of transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation offers significant benefits to recipients, yet risks to donors remain incompletely characterized. We examined short- and intermediate-term outcomes associated with living liver donation using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. This retrospective cohort study included 8619 donors aged 18-65 years who donated between 1989 and 2023, of whom 8314 had follow-up data for secondary outcomes. Donors were categorized by era: early (1989-2006) and contemporary (2007-2023). Primary outcomes were 90-day and 2-year mortality; secondary outcomes were changes in physical capacity, functional status, and employment. Mean donor age was 36 years, and 53% were female. Eight donors (0.1%) died within 90 days and 18 (0.2%) within 2 years. Mortality was lower in the contemporary era at both 90 days (HR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03-0.70) and 2 years (HR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.02-0.18). Reduced physical capacity at 6 months was more common among contemporary-era donors (aOR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.32-8.00) and Hispanic donors (aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.29-3.32). Reduced employment was more common among non-White donors at 6 months and 1 year (aOR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.40-2.97 at 1 year), and among female donors at all timepoints (aOR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.29-2.25 at 1 year). Living liver donor mortality has declined over the past three decades, and long-term physical impairments are uncommon. Reduced employment following donation is disproportionately reported by female and non-White donors. These findings provide a benchmark for center-level assessment of donor outcomes and may inform donor counseling that addresses occupational circumstances alongside surgical risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.