ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Early Implementation of Collaborative Care in France: Facilitators and Barriers from the First Year of the SESAME Program.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Collaborative Care Model (CoCM), which integrates mental health services into primary care through a team-based approach involving GPs, care managers (CM), and mental health consultants, is a proven way to meet these challenges. A first CoCM adaptation in French primary care settings called SESAME has been implemented since 2021. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with all the healthcare professionals involved in SESAME to examine the facilitators and barriers experienced during the first year. Data were analyzed using a qualitative approach combining manual thematic analysis and lexicometric analysis with ALCESTE software. Results: Four discourse classes emerged from the analysis. Key facilitators included prior collaborative experience, effective digital communication tools, and clear role understanding. Barriers such as technological challenges, role ambiguity, and referral framework misunderstandings were also identified. The structured inclusion process and rapid access to care were appreciated, but challenges persisted in referral processes and role boundary definitions. Financial coverage and a less stigmatizing approach were seen as benefits. Conclusion: This study provides insights into the early implementation dynamics of CoCM in a novel context, underscoring the need for clear protocols, ongoing communication, and tailored support to ensure successful integration of mental health services into primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.