ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Assessing vocal fold movement in healthy young children and infants using laryngeal ultrasound by speech and language therapists: a feasibility study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vocal fold motion impairment (VFMI) is a common laryngeal disorder in infants and young children and may impact respiration, phonation and swallowing. Flexible nasendoscopy (FNE) is the current gold standard for assessment; however, its invasive nature may limit its use for routine screening. Recent studies reported good sensitivity and specificity of laryngeal ultrasound (LUS), a minimally invasive alternative compared to FNE. However, its application by Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) in the paediatric population remains underexplored. Objectives/hypothesis: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a novel SLT-led LUS protocol for infants and young children and to examine the reliability of defined laryngeal measurements. Methods: In this mixed-methods feasibility study, eleven participants (nine children aged 3- and 4-years-old and two 2-month-old infants) underwent an SLT-led LUS protocol incorporating quiet breathing and functional tasks. Completion and visualisation rates were analysed as an indicator of feasibility. Laryngeal landmarks were identified and laryngeal measurements were quantified in selected static images by two raters. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Inductive thematic analysis of the LUS operator's field notes was used to identify experiences of conducting the protocol and areas for future refinement. Results: The protocol demonstrated high feasibility, with good completion and visualisation rates. Differences were noted across tasks, with a higher visualisation rate in quiet breathing and swallowing than in phonation. Inductive thematic analysis of the LUS operator's experience highlighted areas for future refinement of the protocol. Quantitative analysis showed excellent reliability between raters across laryngeal measures, with moderate to excellent confidence intervals. Conclusion: This feasibility study provides initial evidence for an SLT-led LUS protocol to assess paediatric laryngeal function. LUS may enhance clinical pathways by enabling non-invasive screening and monitoring, while also serving as a research tool for phonation and swallowing. Further studies with larger and more diverse samples, including those with VFMI, are needed to establish clinical utility and generalisability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.