ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Conjoined lumbar nerve roots: A potential cause of lumbosciatica and an incidental finding-A three-case report.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital anomalies of the lumbar nerve roots are uncommon within the broader spectrum of congenital vertebromedullary malformations. They are typically identified in adulthood. Often underrecognized, they may lead to inadvertent nerve injury during surgery. These anomalies can be discovered incidentally or during lumbosciatica imaging investigation. In our region, CT scan is the only available cross-sectional imaging modality. Although it has lower resolution than MRI, it enabled the detection of this anomaly in three patients. In one case, the anomaly was revealed by lumbosciatica, whereas in the other two cases, it was an incidental finding. In this article, we highlight the key imaging features necessary for accurate recognition of this underreported anomaly. Its prevalence is likely underestimated in preoperative imaging. It should be systematically considered among the differential diagnoses of enlarged nerve roots to ensure it is not overlooked. Its presence should be explicitly reported in the preoperative assessment, as failure to recognize the anomaly may result in nerve injury during surgery. Classification systems for lumbar nerve root anomalies have evolved substantially over the past decades. Among the various classification systems proposed, that of Neidre and MacNab (NM), subsequently amended on two occasions, remains one of the most widely used. More recently, Nikolenko et al. proposed a unifying classification system aimed at reconciling and integrating the various existing approaches to spinal nerve root anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.