SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Ketamine use in the refractory and super refractory status epilepticus: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and intensive care requirements. Ketamine has emerged as a potential adjunct because of its N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonism and relatively favourable haemodynamic profile. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ketamine in RSE and SRSE resolution. Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024625516). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Biblioteca Virtual en Salud were searched from inception to 20 November 2025. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted clinical, therapeutic, electroencephalographic, haemodynamic, and survival data, and assessed risk of bias using National Institutes of Health quality assessment tools. Meta-analysis was not performed because of substantial heterogeneity. Results: Twelve studies comprising 491 patients were included. Ketamine was generally administered as part of multimodal therapy after failure of several antiseizure medications and intravenous anaesthetics. Infusion rates ranged from 0.05 mg/kg/h to 10.5 mg/kg/h, and treatment duration ranged from 6 h to 29 days. Study-defined response rates following ketamine initiation ranged from 43.3% for complete electrographic seizure cessation to 100% for overall RSE/SRSE resolution; however, the highest estimates often reflected combined treatment rather than ketamine alone. Short-term or hospital survival ranged from 45.8% to 81.8%. Immediate haemodynamic deterioration appeared uncommon, although attribution was limited by baseline instability and concomitant therapy. Conclusion: Ketamine-containing regimens were associated with clinically relevant seizure reduction or cessation in RSE/SRSE, without a consistent signal of acute haemodynamic harm. However, the independent effect of ketamine on sustained seizure control, survival, and functional recovery remains uncertain. Prospective comparative studies using standardised dosing, timing, and outcome definitions are required. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO identifier CRD42024625516.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.