ArticleJournal of plastic and reconstructive surgery2026
Demarcation Procedure: An Effective and Safe Method before Definitive Resection of Large Arteriovenous Malformations.
Article in Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Surgical resection of large arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is challenging owing to its prolonged operative time and massive bleeding, particularly in anatomically complex regions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a staged "demarcation procedure," a partial incision designed to interrupt blood flow and form a scar plane, in reducing intraoperative bleeding and operative time during definitive resection. Methods: Between 2014 and 2021, six patients diagnosed with Schöbinger stage III AVMs were treated using our demarcation procedure, followed by definitive resection. Lesion locations included the head and neck (n = 5) and the hand (n = 1). Operative time and intraoperative blood loss were analyzed for both demarcation procedures and definitive resections. Reconstructive procedures were also performed during the final definitive resection. Results: The demarcation procedure was performed once in two patients, twice in three, and three times in one. Fascial grafts were used in two patients and artificial dermis in three. At definitive resection, free flaps (n = 5) or a pedicled flap (n = 1) were applied, often with additional skin grafting. The median blood loss was 95 mL for demarcation and 510.5 mL for definitive resection with reconstruction. Median operative time was 220 minutes for demarcation and 236 minutes for definitive resection. No recurrences were observed during follow-up. Conclusions: The demarcation procedure, which establishes a fibrous boundary and controls feeder vessels, reduces blood loss and operative time during definitive resection of AVMs. Although this method requires multiple surgeries under general anesthesia and relatively prolonged hospitalization, it may serve as a safe and effective option for the resection of large AVMs, particularly in the head and neck.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.