Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835210›Full record

ReviewiScience2026

Ship navigation behavior pattern mining: Representations and intelligent methods.

Yu Xiong, Da Wang, Luo Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu XiongCollege of Electronic Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Da WangCollege of Electronic Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Luo ChenCollege of Electronic Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maritime transportation is a core pillar of global trade. Mining meaningful behavioral patterns from ship trajectories is essential for characterizing ship movement regularities, supporting maritime traffic management, and improving maritime situational awareness. Although substantial progress has been made in anomaly detection, trajectory prediction, and scenario-specific behavior recognition, publicly available labeled datasets remain limited by incomplete labeling schemes, and ship behavior modeling still lacks a unified framework. To clarify these gaps, this review systematically examines data sources, labeled datasets, behavior modeling, mining methods, and practical applications related to ship navigation behavior pattern mining. It further proposes a three-layer behavior modeling framework that organizes ship behavior into physical behavior, interactive behavior, and semantic behavior. This framework connects low-level motion states, spatiotemporal interactions with the maritime environment and other ships, and high-level semantic interpretation, thereby providing a structured basis for understanding behavioral patterns in ship trajectories. Building on this review, we summarize the major challenges and future research directions in the field. This study provides a reference for subsequent research and aims to promote the development of ship navigation behavior pattern mining, particularly by extending spatial data mining methods for static data toward spatiotemporal pattern mining of dynamic streaming data from moving objects.

Indexed as

behavior pattern miningbehavior pattern representationsdeep-representation learninglarge-model-enhanced methodsship navigation behavior pattern

Identifiers

PMID42835210
PMCPMC13635003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.