SynthesisInternational journal of public health2026
Deploying artificial intelligence for occupational and environmental health in waste management: a systematic review.
Synthesis in International journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This systematic review examines how artificial intelligence (AI) mitigates occupational and environmental health risks in waste management, a sector where workers and communities face infectious, toxic, and physical hazards. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched the SCOPUS database and reviewed 81 peer-reviewed articles. The analysis focused on the types of AI technologies applied, their deployment across waste management stages, and the specific health risks they address. Results: The analysis identifies five types of health risks targeted by AI applications. AI is deployed across five waste management stages and four technical paradigms (supervised, unsupervised, reinforcement, and deep learning). AI alleviates hazards via three primary pathways: automated risk-source isolation, robotic substitution for high-risk tasks, and macro-level exposure monitoring. Conclusion: Current public health research has largely neglected health risk reduction gains from waste management technological innovation. Institutional innovations that can facilitate responsible AI deployment are discussed. This interdisciplinary perspective underscores the necessity of cross-sector collaboration to tackle public health issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.