ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2026
Positional variation in hemodynamic and morphologic parameters of the iliofemoral venous segment in healthy volunteers.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Iliofemoral venous stenting has become the standard of care for patients with quality-of-life-impairing manifestations of chronic iliac venous obstruction. The initial diagnosis of chronic iliac venous obstruction is through the use of duplex ultrasound (DUS). Here, set diameters are used for each segment (common femoral vein [CFV], external iliac vein [EIV], and common iliac vein [CIV]) to determine if a patient has venous stenosis or not. However, there is concern that DUS measurements obtained in the supine position (standard approach) are different from those when the person is standing, thereby raising the question as to the appropriate positioning for such a study. This study evaluates this possibility through DUS examination of healthy adults. Methods: Sixteen limbs (eight healthy volunteers) without any symptoms or signs of chronic venous disease underwent DUS of their right and left CFV, EIV, and CIV segments in the supine and standing positions. Measurements included peak velocity (PV), time-averaged velocity (TAV), and the smallest vein diameter in each segment. Measurements were done for each person across six cohorts: CFV, EIV, CIV, CFV + EIV, EIV + CIV, and CFV + EIV + CIV. Normality of paired differences was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Variables demonstrating non-normal distributions were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, whereas normally distributed variables were compared using paired Results: In the CFV, the PV and TAV were both greater in the supine than in the standing position ( Conclusions: Venous duplex-derived flow velocities in the iliac vein in healthy volunteers demonstrate a moderate to large, statistically significant decrease from supine to standing position without a significant change in the vein diameter. This raises the question about the relevance of any increase in vein diameter from supine to standing, which has become an important contemporary issue. Further study is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.