ArticleDiabetology international2026
Association between stigma and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Diabetology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To investigate the comprehensive association between diabetes stigma, treatment satisfaction, and clinical parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 307 Japanese outpatients. Diabetes stigma was assessed using the Kanden Institute Stigma Scale (KISS). Treatment satisfaction and perceived hyperglycemia were evaluated via the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Data regarding patient demographics, comorbidities, and antidiabetic treatments were also collected. We investigated independent factors associated with the continuous KISS score using multivariable linear regression models to prevent information loss. Results: The median age of the participants was 69 years, median body mass index (BMI) was 24.9 kg/m2, and median HbA1c was 7.1%. The median continuous KISS score was 11. In the multivariable linear regression model, after adjusting for prespecified confounders, including age, sex, duration of diabetes, and the number of antidiabetic agents, higher body mass index (BMI), the use of injection therapy, lower treatment satisfaction, and a higher perceived frequency of hyperglycemia were independently associated with higher continuous KISS scores (all Conclusions: In patients with type 2 diabetes, a higher burden of diabetes stigma is independently associated with comorbid obesity, the use of injection therapy, lower treatment satisfaction, and the subjective perception of hyperglycemia, but not independently with objective HbA1c. This highlights the necessity of addressing patient experiences and psychosocial burden beyond objective glycemic targets. Graphical abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-026-00935-0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.