ArticleJournal of plastic and reconstructive surgery2026
Learning Curve and Technical Strategies in 100 Consecutive Head and Neck Free-Flap Reconstructions by an Early-Career Plastic Surgeon.
Article in Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Mastering microvascular techniques for head and neck reconstruction presents considerable challenges, particularly for early-career plastic surgeons in low-volume settings. This study evaluates the learning curve and technical strategies of a junior surgeon who performed 100 consecutive head and neck free-flap reconstructions at a tertiary referral center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 100 consecutive reconstructions by a single early-career surgeon at a university hospital in Okinawa, Japan. Cases were grouped into four sequential phases (25 each) to assess performance trends. Key parameters included operative duration, flap type, recipient vessel selection, complication rates, and flap survival. Results: Mean operative time declined from approximately 780 minutes in Phase 1 to 600 minutes in Phase 4 (23% reduction; p < 0.001). Flap survival rose from 92% to 100% across phases (overall 98%). Re-anastomosis rates decreased from 50% in the first 25 cases to 5% in the final 25 cases. Ischemic time shortened by 40% (p < 0.001). These improvements coincided with deliberate technical refinements and workflow optimizations, including expanded use of the transverse cervical artery. Conclusions: With a structured, evidence-based approach, early-career plastic surgeons can achieve excellent outcomes even in low-volume environments. The observed improvements underscore the importance of targeted technical refinements and strategic vessel selection in overcoming the microsurgical learning curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.