ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026
A single-cell atlas and Shiny-based framework for murine lung injury and remodeling.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing has provided unprecedented insights into the cellular heterogeneity of acute and chronic pulmonary injury. Lack of data-driven analytical frameworks remains a significant barrier to reproducible and biologically robust analyses. To address this challenge, we developed a modular, interactive analysis platform for single-cell RNA sequencing data processing and visualization. As a case study, we applied the framework to an immune-enriched murine lung dataset containing samples from different batches and across four conditions: control, inflammation and remodeling, fibrosis, and fibrotic lung with ozone exposure. Manual annotations performed on individual samples were used as ground-truth labels to evaluate automated cell-type annotations generated using the Tabula Muris Senis and LungMAP reference atlases. These annotations were also utilized to benchmark the performance of data preprocessing and integration combinations on batch-effect removal and the preservation of biological identity. Within the LIANA framework, we evaluated eight inference algorithms and 18 references for cell-cell communication analysis. In our results, we outlined the framework of the analysis pipeline and interactive platform. Through manual annotation, we identified 36 distinct cell populations, highlighting the limitations of automated reference-based annotations in resolving cell states missing from underlying references - particularly injury-induced monocyte-derived macrophages and eosinophils. In our dataset, Log-normalization outperformed SCTransform in both preserving cell-type separation and batch mixing, while FastMNN provided the best balance between technical batch correction and the retention of cell subtype identities. Cell-cell communication analysis revealed that permutation-based algorithms used by CellChat and CellPhoneDB improved prediction confidence, while MouseConsensus and OmniPath resources increased interaction coverage. These findings demonstrate that preprocessing, integration, and cell annotation strategies should be selected in a context-dependent, data-driven manner rather than relying on default workflows. The annotated murine lung dataset expands the existing atlas, and the modular interactive platform offers a practical framework to improve accessibility, reproducibility, and analytical precision in pulmonary research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.