Trial reportResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
Denecimig (Mim8) prophylaxis in children with hemophilia A with or without factor VIII inhibitors.
Trial report in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05306418 (Safety, Efficacy and Exposure of Subcutaneously Administered NNC0365-3769), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety, Efficacy and Exposure of Subcutaneously Administered NNC0365-3769 (Mim8) Prophylaxis in Children With Haemophilia A With or Without FVIII Inhibitors
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Denecimig (Mim8) is a next-generation activated factor (F)VIII mimetic bispecific antibody developed for subcutaneous prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A (HA). Objectives: This study evaluated 52-week outcomes with denecimig in children from the phase 3 FRONTIER3 study (NCT05306418). Methods: Children aged 1 to 11 years with HA with or without FVIII inhibitors, received subcutaneous denecimig once every week (QW) for 26 weeks (Part 1). In Part 2, caregivers chose to continue QW or switch to once-every-month (QM) dosing for 26 weeks. Primary end point was the number of treatment-emergent adverse events. Assessed secondary outcomes included the number of treated bleeds and subtypes, injection-site reactions, antidenecimig antibodies, and caregiver-reported outcomes. Results: All 70 enrolled participants completed Parts 1 and 2 of the study. During Part 2, 38 participants continued QW and 32 switched to QM. All treatment-emergent adverse events were mild/moderate, and none led to discontinuation. No thromboembolic events or clinical evidence of neutralizing antibodies were reported; injection-site reactions were infrequent (∼1% of injections). Estimated mean annualized bleeding rates for treated bleeds were 0.53 (Part 1, QW), 0.42 (Part 2, QW), 0.25 (Part 2, QM), and 0.50 (Parts 1 and 2, QW); 74% to 88% of participants had zero treated bleeds; no bleeds were reported in inhibitor-positive children with HA with inhibitors. All 10 baseline target joints resolved. Caregivers reported reduced treatment burden and improved physical functioning, and 98% of caregivers preferred denecimig to prior therapy. Conclusion: Over 52 weeks, denecimig prophylaxis was well tolerated with no safety concerns and provided robust bleed protection, reduced treatment burden, and improved overall health-related quality of life in children with HA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.