ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Multidimensional team performance indicators in men's UEFA EURO 2024: an exploratory analysis.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined multidimensional team-level performance indicators from men's UEFA EURO 2024 and evaluated whether they could support exploratory classification and descriptive benchmarking. Publicly available data from all 24 participating teams were analysed using seven retained indicators representing possession, attacking output, expected performance, and progression. Relationships among indicators were examined, and a composite Team Strength Score (TSS) was calculated from normalised retained indicators after cumulative counts were expressed per 90 min. Exploratory classification accuracy ranged from 0.50 to 0.58 and did not exceed the 0.67 majority-class baseline. The strongest correlations were observed between goals and assists (r = 0.91), xG and xA (r = 0.90), progressive carries and progressive passes (r = 0.89), and possession and progressive passes (r = 0.89). These associations partly reflect intrinsic relationships among football actions and should not be interpreted as independent determinants of performance. Spain and Germany had the highest TSS values. The framework may support post-tournament benchmarking, opponent analysis, and communication between performance analysts and coaching staff, provided that possession, progression, and expected-performance indicators are interpreted alongside realised outcomes and match context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.