ArticleiScience2026
Reducing cognitive demand fails to mitigate choice overload: Multimodal neural and gaze evidence for effort conservation.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An overabundance of options can impair decision-making, a phenomenon known as choice overload. Modern platforms use recommendation and filtering tools to mitigate this by lowering cognitive demand, yet whether these strategies actually improve choices remains unclear. We conducted two experiments that manipulated cognitive demand-by presenting high-attractiveness option sets or by providing a shortlist tool-while recording eye-tracking and electroencephalography (EEG) as participants chose from sets of 6-24 options. Reducing demand accelerated decisions but did not improve choice performance as set size increased. Under low-demand conditions, eye-gaze measures revealed narrower visual search and fixation-locked EEG showed shorter event-related potential latencies and weaker occipital alpha suppression, and the three modalities co-varied within individuals, indicating that participants conserved rather than reallocated cognitive effort. These findings demonstrate that simplifying decisions can backfire: when choices feel easier, people disengage rather than optimize, leaving choice overload intact. Effective choice architecture should therefore sustain deliberation, not merely reduce demand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.