Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42834914›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Clinical outcomes of endovascular stenting versus bypass surgery for aortoiliac occlusive disease: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Pengchao Duan, Yu-Han Qi, Jichun Zhao, Bin Huang, Ding Yuan, Tiehao Wang, Jiarong Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pengchao DuanDivision of Vascular Surgery Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan Province, China.
Yu-Han QiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Jichun ZhaoDivision of Vascular Surgery Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan Province, China.
Bin HuangDivision of Vascular Surgery Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan Province, China.
Ding YuanDivision of Vascular Surgery Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan Province, China.
Tiehao WangDivision of Vascular Surgery Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan Province, China.
Jiarong WangDivision of Vascular Surgery Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare perioperative and follow-up outcomes between endovascular stenting and bypass surgery in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 78 patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease between January 2015 and January 2021, including 58 who underwent endovascular stenting and 20 who underwent bypass surgery. Perioperative complications, healthcare utilization, overall survival, primary patency, freedom from reintervention, and limb-related outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: Among the 78 included patients, the technical success rate was 100% in both groups. Postoperative systemic complications occurred in 3 patients (5.1%) in the ES group and 10 patients (50.0%) in the BS group ( Conclusion: In this selected retrospective cohort, endovascular stenting was associated with shorter hospitalization and fewer systemic complications than bypass surgery. No statistically significant differences in procedure-related complications, survival, primary patency, reintervention, or limb-related outcomes were observed during follow-up. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the small sample size, treatment-selection bias, and differences in follow-up duration.

Indexed as

aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD)bypass surgeryendovascular stentingprimary patencyreintervention

Identifiers

PMID42834914
PMCPMC13634836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.