ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Exclusion of Participants for Substance Use in Clinical Trials.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patterns of inclusion and exclusion of individuals who use illicit substances from clinical trials have not been well-studied. Given the widespread and increasing prevalence of drug use in the United States, this has significant implications for the generalizability of scientific findings and the validity of treatment recommendations for individuals with and without co-morbid substance use. Here, we analyzed study protocol eligibility and the rationale for excluding substance users using data from ClinicalTrials.gov. We found that 43% (110/254) of interventional and 7% (3/46) of observational study protocols excluded people who use substances. The description of substance use ranged widely across the study protocols, varying by the level of use, the time period of use, and the definition of which specific substances or substance categories were excluded. The majority (63%, 69/110) of studies that excluded substance use either did not offer any rationale for the exclusion or did not give a specific justification related to substance use. Additional guidance is needed to standardize the definitions and assessment of substance use applied to clinical trial eligibility determinations and to formalize the justification of inclusion and exclusion of substance use based on explicit scientific, clinical, ethical, and safety criteria.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.