ArticleAnnals of medicine2026
Patient-Reported Outcome scale for Bronchiectasis (BE-PRO): development and validation in China.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become essential endpoints in clinical trials for bronchiectasis. However, no validated PRO instrument currently exists for the Chinese population. This study aimed to develop and validate a disease-specific Patient-Reported Outcome scale for Bronchiectasis (BE-PRO) tailored to Chinese patients.
methodsA mixed-methods approach was used to develop the BE-PRO. The conceptual framework and initial item pool were developed primarily from semi-structured patient interviews and supplemented by literature and existing-instrument reviews and medical-record analysis. Items were refined through qualitative review by experts and patients. Two field surveys were then conducted, with items selected using classical test theory (CTT), item response theory (IRT), and structural equation modeling (SEM). Finally, a formal validation survey assessed the psychometric properties of the BE-PRO.
resultsThe final BE-PRO consists of 16 items organized into five domains: physiology, psychology, environment, society, and treatment satisfaction. The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's
conclusionThe 16-item BE-PRO is a reliable, psychometrically validated and feasible instrument for assessing patient-reported outcomes in Chinese patients with bronchiectasis. Its strong psychometric properties support its use in both clinical trials and routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.