Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42834751›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2026

Patient-Reported Outcome scale for Bronchiectasis (BE-PRO): development and validation in China.

Yang Xie, Peng Zhang, Jiajia Wang, Tao Chen, Jiansheng Li

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yang XieDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, National Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, National Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Jiajia WangDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, National Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Tao ChenHenan International Joint Laboratory of Evidence-Based Evaluation for Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Jiansheng LiDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, National Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6485-2371

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become essential endpoints in clinical trials for bronchiectasis. However, no validated PRO instrument currently exists for the Chinese population. This study aimed to develop and validate a disease-specific Patient-Reported Outcome scale for Bronchiectasis (BE-PRO) tailored to Chinese patients.

methodsA mixed-methods approach was used to develop the BE-PRO. The conceptual framework and initial item pool were developed primarily from semi-structured patient interviews and supplemented by literature and existing-instrument reviews and medical-record analysis. Items were refined through qualitative review by experts and patients. Two field surveys were then conducted, with items selected using classical test theory (CTT), item response theory (IRT), and structural equation modeling (SEM). Finally, a formal validation survey assessed the psychometric properties of the BE-PRO.

resultsThe final BE-PRO consists of 16 items organized into five domains: physiology, psychology, environment, society, and treatment satisfaction. The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's

conclusionThe 16-item BE-PRO is a reliable, psychometrically validated and feasible instrument for assessing patient-reported outcomes in Chinese patients with bronchiectasis. Its strong psychometric properties support its use in both clinical trials and routine practice.

Indexed as

BronchiectasisPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesBronchiectasispatient-reported outcome measurequality of life

Identifiers

PMID42834751
PMCPMC13644423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.