SynthesisColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2026
A systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative MRI-based pelvimetry in predicting surgical difficulty in rectal cancer: Implications for personalised surgical planning.
Synthesis in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based pelvimetry has been investigated for predicting surgical difficulty in total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. However, heterogeneity in pelvimetric parameters, surrogate outcomes, and study design has resulted in inconsistent evidence. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the evidence on commonly used MRI parameters and difficulty surrogates and assess their methodological robustness and clinical relevance.
methodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched through December 2025 for studies evaluating preoperative MRI pelvimetry in patients undergoing TME for rectal cancer. Outcome parameters were surrogate measures of surgical difficulty, including operating time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion to open surgery, pathological quality metrics, and postoperative complications. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) tool. This systematic review and meta-analysis was reported in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement and prospectively registered (PROSPERO: CRD420261287153).
resultsThirty-six studies comprising 8,364 patients were included. Common parameters included sagittal measurements and axial interspinous distance (ISD) and intertuberous distance (ITD). Definitions of surgical difficulty varied substantially. ROBINS-E identified some concerns in 30 studies, a high risk of bias in five, and insufficient information in one. Meta-analysis of six studies (n = 769) showed that shorter ISD (mean difference [MD] -5.13 mm, 95% CI -6.61 to -3.65; p < 0.001; I
conclusionsMRI-based pelvimetry, particularly ISD and ITD, may help predict surgical difficulty in TME. However, methodological heterogeneity limits broader quantitative synthesis and highlights the need for standardised pelvimetric protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.