ArticleACR open rheumatology2026
Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy of Focused Frontal-Branch Ultrasonography in Giant Cell Arteritis.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and acquisition time of focused bilateral frontal-branch ultrasonography based on intima-media thickness (IMT) in suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA).
methodsIn this prospective single-center study, 171 patients underwent color Doppler ultrasonography of the temporal and large arteries and ultrasonography-guided temporal artery biopsy. Bilateral mean frontal-branch IMT was evaluated against the expert diagnosis established at six months. Diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC analysis and multivariable logistic regression. Reproducibility was assessed in 100 randomly selected images.
resultsGCA was diagnosed in 107 patients, including 96 biopsy-positive cases. Mean frontal-branch IMT had the highest observed area under the curve among the temporal artery segments (0.87). At the 0.28-mm cutoff, sensitivity was 71%, specificity 94%, LR+ 11.4, and LR- 0.31. Frontal IMT ≥ 0.28 mm was the strongest independent predictor of GCA (odds ratio 43.0). At a cutoff of ≥3, the exploratory PAMELA (Performance Analysis of a Monosegmental Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Frontal-Branch of the Superficial Temporal Artery in Giant Cell Arteritis) score had a sensitivity of 74.8% and specificity of 93.7%. Focused bilateral frontal-branch assessment required 1.07 ± 0.24 minutes versus 7.62 ± 1.11 minutes for the complete temporal artery protocol. Intraobserver and interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.96 and 0.93.
conclusionFocused bilateral frontal-branch ultrasonography provides a highly specific, reproducible, and time-efficient initial cranial assessment in suspected GCA. However, the 0.28-mm cutoff and PAMELA score require external validation, and the remaining temporal and large-vessel territories should be examined when frontal findings are negative or equivocal.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.