ArticleZoological letters2026
The role of female reproductive fluid in mediating reproductive isolation between ecotypes of the three-spined stickleback.
Article in Zoological letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Female reproductive fluid (FRF) is increasingly recognised as a potent mediator of gametic-level cryptic female mating bias in external fertilisers, yet its role in reproductive isolation during early ecological divergence remains largely untested. We examined whether FRF from three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) females on North Uist differentially attracts and sustains sperm from armourless (acidic loch) versus armoured (basic loch) ecotypes. Using a fully crossed diallel design across four allopatric populations and a sympatric contact zone, we quantified spermatozoa accumulation in a sperm-selection chamber and spermatozoa swimming longevity in response to conspecific and heterospecific FRF versus loch-water controls. More spermatozoa accumulated in selection chambers in response to FRF than in paired controls. Both sperm attraction and swimming longevity were enhanced by FRF. Attraction was stronger in same-ecotype pairings, whereas longevity showed clear male-environment-by-medium interactions, with acid- and basic-adapted males performing best in water chemistry matching their natal habitat. FRF therefore has the potential to function as a previously unrecognised gametic barrier, reinforcing pre-mating isolation and reducing gene flow between recently diverged ecotypes in this adaptive radiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.