ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Clinical management of metachromatic leukodystrophy cases identified in the German and Austrian Newborn screening pilots.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is a rapidly progressive leukodystrophy that leads to severe disability and early death if untreated. Autologous hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell gene therapy (HSPC-GT, atidarsagene autotemcel, arsa-cel) for early onset subtypes and allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for late onset disease substantially alters disease progression for early onset disease when administered before symptom onset, creating a strong rationale for newborn screening (NBS). At the same time, NBS technique for MLD in dried blood spots has recently been demonstrated to be robust and highly accurate. The aim was to give real-world results from the world's first NBS pilots for clinical management and treatment of identified children.
methodsBetween September 2021 and July 2025, 359,282 newborns underwent NBS for MLD in two different laboratories in Germany and Austria using a three-tier algorithm integrating sulfatide quantification, arylsulfatase A (ARSA) activity measurement, and ARSA sequencing. Screen-positive infants underwent a predefined care pathway including standardized confirmatory diagnostics, genotype-based and biochemical prediction of disease onset, clinical assessment and management guiding early treatment and surveillance at the qualified treatment center (QTC) in Tübingen.
resultsNine newborns screened positive and all were confirmed to have MLD (detection rate approximately 1 per 40,000). Based on genotype and leukocyte ARSA enzyme activity, disease onset prediction was possible in all of them. Seven infants were classified as having pre-symptomatic early-onset MLD and were referred for HSPC-GT. All treated infants showed preserved neurological function up to 30 months after treatment (median 18.5 months). Two infants predicted to develop late-onset MLD entered structured surveillance for treatment with HSCT and have remained clinically asymptomatic for CNS signs of disease. No false-positive or known false-negative results were observed.
conclusionThese results from our pilot programs demonstrate that NBS enables reliable early identification of MLD and support streamlined care pathways leading to timely intervention. Importantly, this study provides real-world evidence illustrating that NBS for MLD can enable timely, pre-symptomatic treatment and structured surveillance within standard national healthcare systems. These findings further substantiate the value of NBS for MLD at a critical moment as several countries consider national implementation of MLD screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.