ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Why are pictures remembered better than sounds? The roles of subjective vividness of mental imagery and semantic labels.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pictures are recognized more accurately than environmental sounds, possibly because pictures provide enhanced conceptual and perceptual representations than sounds. Conceptual-perceptual distinctiveness (CPD) theory proposes that pictures benefit from stronger semantic organization and more diagnostic perceptual detail. It remains unclear whether the picture superiority effect reflects differences in the subjective vividness of retrieved memories and whether increasing category-level semantic support can enhance vividness for environmental sounds, thereby reducing picture superiority in recognition memory. Vividness was assessed independently of recognition by having participants generate a mental image from a written label and rate its vividness before old/new judgment of the recognition probe. Experiment 1 replicated the picture superiority effect, with pictures producing higher vividness and recognition accuracy than sounds. In Experiments 2A and 2B, written labels strengthened category-level semantic support for sounds, increasing vividness and target recognition and eliminating modality differences for targets. However, pictures continued to show superior lure (i.e., exemplar foil) discrimination and higher vividness preceding accurate lure rejection. Generalized linear mixed-effects (GLMM) analyses showed that vividness selectively predicted correct target recognition for pictures, whereas for sounds, greater vividness also increased false recognition of lures. Together, these findings suggest that semantic support enhances vividness of mental imagery and target recognition for sounds, whereas the picture superiority effect for lure recognition reflects stronger item-specific retrieval information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42834315What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.