ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Patient Perspectives on Leveraging Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy Visits to Improve Chronic Disease Care.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-acting injectable (LAI) antiretroviral therapy (ART) for treatment of HIV requires more frequent healthcare interactions than standard care, offering opportunities to enhance monitoring and management of comorbid chronic conditions among people with HIV (PWH). We conducted in-depth interviews with PWH to explore perspectives on LAI-ART uptake and readiness to switch from oral ART, as well as opportunities to integrate chronic disease care into routine LAI-ART visits. Participants who were virally suppressed and had one or more chronic medical conditions were eligible. Transcripts were analyzed using applied thematic analysis, and readiness for LAI-ART was characterized using the Transtheoretical Model. Twenty-four PWH were interviewed (8 on LAI-ART and 16 on oral ART). Perceived advantages of LAI-ART included logistical convenience and relief from pill-related emotional burden, while disadvantages included dislike of injections and increased visit frequency. Provider guidance played a central role in decision-making, and satisfaction with current regimens reduced interest in LAI-ART. All participants receiving LAI-ART intended to continue this regimen, and readiness to switch among those receiving oral ART ranged from little interest to actively planning a transition. Despite varied views on LAI-ART as a personal treatment choice, most participants viewed integrating chronic disease management into LAI-ART visits as acceptable and beneficial, particularly for cardiovascular risk assessments, mental health, and social needs. Some participants on oral ART reported that access to integrated services could increase openness to initiating LAI-ART. Overall, LAI-ART visits were viewed as a potentially valuable platform for integrating chronic disease management that aligns with patient priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42834312What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.