ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
An Automated Machine Learning Based Framework for Scan Level Coronary Artery Calcium Risk Stratification.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring plays a crucial role in the early detection and risk stratification of coronary artery disease (CAD). Current techniques for CAC analysis rely on manual annotations by clinicians and large curated training datasets. This study introduces a fully automatic framework for CAC risk stratification that eliminates the need for manual clinical annotations. We introduce a novel pixel-attenuation-based feature extraction pipeline for automatic CAC assessment that leverages pseudo-labelling to identify regions of interest, reducing reliance on expert annotations. We compared our method against two alternative feature extraction strategies: a radiomics-based pipeline and a foundation-model-based pipeline. Our study focuses on non-contrast images from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) scans. Training and testing were conducted on an in-house electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated CCTA dataset comprising 182 patients, categorized into risk groups based on CAC scores. We further investigated the impact of training exclusively on non-contrast data versus a combined dataset of contrast-enhanced and non-contrast scans, while all evaluations performed solely on non-contrast images. To assess generalizability, we applied our pipeline to the publicly available COCA-Coronary Calcium and Chest CTs dataset, demonstrating robust performance even on lower-quality, non-gated scans. The pixel-attenuation feature extraction pipeline outperformed radiomics and deep learning approaches for CAC risk classification, with accuracies of 92%, 93%, and 87%, and F1-scores of 92%, 90%, and 78% across the two-, three-, and five-class classification tasks, respectively. We present a cost-effective and time-efficient framework for early CAD patient stratification that can be implemented in clinical settings while reducing additional diagnostic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42834294What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.