Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42834261›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026

From Participant to Passenger: Workers' Experiences of Recovery During a Workers' Compensation Claim.

Elizabeth Pritchard, Samineh Sanatkar, Libby Callaway, Grainne Cruickshank, Jason Thompson, Branislava Godic, Genevieve Grant, Ellen MacEachen, Alex Collie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth PritchardSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 509 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3004, Melbourne, Australia.
Samineh SanatkarSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 509 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3004, Melbourne, Australia. samineh.sanatkar@monash.edu.
Libby CallawaySchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Grainne CruickshankSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Jason ThompsonMelbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Branislava GodicMelbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Genevieve GrantAustralian Centre for Justice Innovation, Faculty of Law, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Ellen MacEachenSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Alex CollieSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 509 St Kilda Road, Melbourne VIC 3004, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council DP230100585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial insurance systems provide essential financial support to cover living expenses and medical treatment needs during times of work incapacity. However, many ill and injured workers experience the administrative processes involved in accessing these systems as difficult to navigate, which can stifle recovery and slow return to work. The present study centres workers' lived experiences to better understand facilitators and barriers to recovery, and to identify solutions grounded in workers' perspectives.

methodsTwenty Australian workers with work-related injuries, health, and mental health conditions completed an online interview between February and August 2024. Thematic analysis was used to interpret and group participant responses.

resultsThree themes describing recovery experiences emerged, whereby each theme described a facilitator and a barrier subtheme. Additionally, four solution themes emerged, emphasising the importance of shifting systems towards including workers in decision-making steps, increasing transparency and ease of claim processing, and reducing financial strain.

conclusionsFindings are discussed in light of Administrative Burden Theory (ABT). ABT introduces concepts of learning, compliance, and psychological costs that ill and injured workers bear while engaging with social insurance systems. ABT proposes that these costs are not equally distributed, often disadvantaging those with fewer resources or support networks. We argue that ABT provides a useful framework through which to understand ill and injured workers' experiences with workers' compensation, and that it provides mechanisms to explain workers' suggested solutions.

Indexed as

Administrative burden theoryBarriers and facilitators to recoveryLived experience perspectivesSocial insurance systemThematic analysisWorker-led solutionsWorkers’ compensation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.