ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Changing speed along the mental line: A SNARC-like effect for visual acceleration.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans tend to map magnitudes onto space, with smaller values associated with the left and larger values with the right. Recent evidence suggests that such spatial mappings extend beyond numbers to include visual speed. Whether a second-order motion property, such as visual acceleration, is also spatially represented remains unclear. We addressed this question in two experiments using a centrally presented random dot kinematogram (RDK). Participants indicated, via lateralised key presses, whether the stimulus decelerated or accelerated relative to an initial constant-speed reference. In Experiment 1, all dots moved coherently in a single direction randomly selected on each trial. In Experiment 2, dot directions were randomised at the element level, creating an isotropic motion field. A distance effect (i.e., faster responses for larger absolute acceleration values) emerged in both experiments, indicating that acceleration was processed as a continuous magnitude. Crucially, a left-to-right spatial mapping emerged only in Experiment 2. These findings provide evidence that visual acceleration can be spatially represented, but that this mapping depends on the structure of the motion signal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.