Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42834248›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Indomethacin testing in suspected paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua: Clinical phenotypes and response patterns in a tertiary headache centre.

Antoine Bender, Mirela Muresan, Lauriane Joganah, Eric Salvat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antoine BenderCentre d'Evaluation Et de Traitement de La Douleur, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. antoine.bender@chru-strasbourg.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7600-1113
Mirela MuresanCentre d'Evaluation Et de Traitement de La Douleur, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Lauriane JoganahCentre d'Evaluation Et de Traitement de La Douleur, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Eric SalvatCentre d'Evaluation Et de Traitement de La Douleur, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndomethacin responsiveness is considered the defining diagnostic feature of hemicrania continua and paroxysmal hemicrania. However, the clinical presentation of indomethacin-responsive headaches is often heterogeneous, and practical guidance regarding which patients should undergo an indomethacin trial, the optimal duration of treatment, and the interpretation of partial responses remains limited. CASES: Eighteen patients underwent an indomethacin trial in our pain centre over the last year, of whom eleven (61%) achieved a positive response. Positive responders included patients ultimately diagnosed with probable or definite hemicrania continua (n = 6); and probable or definite paroxysmal hemicrania (n = 5), including secondary forms. Clinical presentations frequently departed from ICHD-3 criteria. Trigeminal autonomic symptoms were absent in several responders, while migrainous features were common. Attack duration in patients with paroxysmal hemicrania frequently exceeded the 30-min upper limit defined by ICHD-3, and some patients presented with pain characteristics suggestive of neuropathic disorders. The median time to a clinically meaningful response was 13 days for hemicrania continua (range 3-35 days) and 11 days for paroxysmal hemicrania (range 4-23 days). Most patients responded to 150 mg/day, although escalation to 225 mg/day or prolonged treatment exceeding four weeks was occasionally required. Seven patients had negative trials, leading to alternative diagnoses including migraine, cluster headache, SUNA, post-traumatic headache, and idiopathic mandibular neuropathy.

conclusionsThis case series illustrates the broad clinical spectrum of indomethacin-responsive headaches and highlights the limitations of relying exclusively on ICHD-3 criteria when selecting patients for an indomethacin trial. Clinical suspicion should remain broad, particularly in patients with strictly unilateral headaches, atypical trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, or refractory unilateral primary headaches.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalIndomethacinParoxysmal HemicraniaAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeTertiary Care CentersTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalIndomethacinCase seriesHeadacheHemicrania continuaICHD-3IndomethacinIndomethacin trialParoxysmal hemicraniaSecondary headache

Identifiers

PMID42834248
PMCPMC13638709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.