Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42834229›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2026

Oral small-molecule GLP-1RA safiglipron versus dapagliflozin in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled phase 3 trial.

Lixin Guo, Dongni Yu, Yimei Xu, Guo Tang, Liang Peng, Chao Meng, Meng Zhao, Wen Hu, Debin Huang, Chaoyang Zeng and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT06589765. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06589765 phase3completed

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HRS-7535 Compared With Dapagliflozin in Adult Participants With Type 2 Diabetes and Inadequate Glycemic Control With Metformin (OUTSTAND-2)

Ran2024Enrolled810Registered outcomes7Posted comparisons0ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsDapagliflozin Tablet, HRS-7535 tablet
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Lixin GuoDepartment of Endocrinology, Beijing Hospital; National Center of Gerontology, National Clinical Research Center for Gerontology, The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics of NHC, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. glx1218@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6863-1798
Dongni YuDepartment of Endocrinology, Beijing Hospital; National Center of Gerontology, National Clinical Research Center for Gerontology, The Key Laboratory of Geriatrics of NHC, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yimei XuClinical Research and Development, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, Shanghai, China.
Guo TangClinical Research and Development, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5411-1441
Liang PengClinical Research and Development, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5407-3737
Chao MengDepartment of General Medicine, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Meng ZhaoDepartment of Endocrinology, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Wen HuDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Huai'an Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, China.
Debin HuangEndocrine and Metabolic Diseases Department, The Third Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, China.
Chaoyang ZengDepartment of Endocrinology, Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, China.
Lei YuDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China.
Guangxiu WuDepartment of Endocrinology, Chongqing University Affiliated Fuling Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Lihui ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yuan GaoDepartment of Endocrinology, Jingjiang People's Hospital, Jingjiang, China.
Tingyan ZhongClinical Research and Development, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, Shanghai, China.
Zi YeClinical Research and Development, Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, Shanghai, China. zi.ye@hengrui.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7740-1238
OUTSTAND-2 Investigator Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safiglipron is an oral small-molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist administered without fasting or dietary restrictions. We evaluated its efficacy and safety versus dapagliflozin in OUTSTAND-2, a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator-controlled trial conducted at 98 sites in China. We randomized 810 adults (mean hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) 8.60%, median diabetes duration 5.0 years, 35.7% women) to safiglipron 30 mg (n = 202), safiglipron 60 mg (n = 203), safiglipron 90 mg (n = 203) or dapagliflozin 10 mg (n = 202) for 32 weeks, followed by a 20-week active-treatment extension. For the primary endpoint, treatment differences versus dapagliflozin in change from baseline in HbA1c at week 32 under the primary non-inferiority estimand were -0.30% (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.51 to -0.09), -0.22% (-0.44 to -0.01) and -0.40% (-0.62 to -0.19) for safiglipron 30 mg, 60 mg and 90 mg, respectively, establishing non-inferiority for all three doses (all P < 0.0001; non-inferiority margin 0.4%). Under the treatment policy estimand, 90 mg met the prespecified statistical criterion for superiority (difference -0.25%; 95% CI: -0.45 to -0.05; one-sided P = 0.0067), whereas 60 mg did not (P = 0.0789), after which fixed-sequence testing stopped. HbA1c target attainment rates with safiglipron versus dapagliflozin were 54.9-63.5% versus 36.5% for HbA1c <7.0% and 38.9-48.6% versus 16.1% for HbA1c ≤6.5%. Mean body weight changes were -2.35%, -3.55%, -4.17% and -3.60% for safiglipron 30 mg, safiglipron 60 mg, safiglipron 90 mg and dapagliflozin, respectively. Fasting plasma glucose, seven-point self-monitored blood glucose profiles, waist circumference, HOMA-β, HOMA-IR and changes in treatment satisfaction showed varying degrees of improvement from baseline with both safiglipron and dapagliflozin. Rescue therapy was used by 0.5-1.5% versus 0% of participants, respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent with safiglipron and mostly mild or moderate; adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 4.0%, 4.0%, 3.9% and 1.5% of participants, respectively. Safiglipron provides an effective oral treatment option for adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06589765 .

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.