Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42834151›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2026

Antiphospholipid syndrome: epidemiology and outcomes in the evolving criteria era.

Georges El Hasbani, Karen Schreiber, Ignasi Rodríguez-Pintó, Katrien M J Devreese, Danieli Andrade, Alí Duarte-García

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Georges El HasbaniDivision of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2571-1450
Karen SchreiberDanish Centre for Expertise in Rheumatology, Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Sønderborg, Denmark.
Ignasi Rodríguez-PintóDepartment of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6193-6396
Katrien M J DevreeseCoagulation Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7559-2579
Danieli AndradeUniversity of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alí Duarte-GarcíaDivision of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. duarte.ali@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1749-5719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a heterogeneous autoimmune thrombo-inflammatory disorder characterized by thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity and an expanding spectrum of microvascular, cardiac, haematological and other systemic manifestations. Although research has provided considerable insights into the pathogenesis and clinical phenotypes of APS, its epidemiology remains difficult to define because estimates depend on case definitions, antibody testing, repeat-testing requirements, testing practices and data sources. Population-based studies suggest that APS is rare, and catastrophic APS is rarer and best understood through registry data. Antiphospholipid antibody positivity alone does not establish APS; transient or low-level positivity can occur without disease, whereas persistent antibodies must be interpreted alongside compatible clinical manifestations. Despite its rarity, APS causes substantial morbidity through recurrent thrombosis, organ damage and adverse pregnancy outcomes, supporting targeted evaluation in unprovoked or recurrent venous thromboembolism, stroke in younger adults and selected pregnancy complications. Apparent differences among populations can reflect ascertainment, access to testing, study design and biological variation. Standardized case definitions, antibody testing and laboratory reporting, together with longitudinal population-based research in ancestry-diverse, paediatric and low-income and middle-income populations, are needed to refine estimates of APS burden and define its clinical spectrum.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.