ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2026
Antiphospholipid syndrome: epidemiology and outcomes in the evolving criteria era.
Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a heterogeneous autoimmune thrombo-inflammatory disorder characterized by thrombosis, pregnancy morbidity and an expanding spectrum of microvascular, cardiac, haematological and other systemic manifestations. Although research has provided considerable insights into the pathogenesis and clinical phenotypes of APS, its epidemiology remains difficult to define because estimates depend on case definitions, antibody testing, repeat-testing requirements, testing practices and data sources. Population-based studies suggest that APS is rare, and catastrophic APS is rarer and best understood through registry data. Antiphospholipid antibody positivity alone does not establish APS; transient or low-level positivity can occur without disease, whereas persistent antibodies must be interpreted alongside compatible clinical manifestations. Despite its rarity, APS causes substantial morbidity through recurrent thrombosis, organ damage and adverse pregnancy outcomes, supporting targeted evaluation in unprovoked or recurrent venous thromboembolism, stroke in younger adults and selected pregnancy complications. Apparent differences among populations can reflect ascertainment, access to testing, study design and biological variation. Standardized case definitions, antibody testing and laboratory reporting, together with longitudinal population-based research in ancestry-diverse, paediatric and low-income and middle-income populations, are needed to refine estimates of APS burden and define its clinical spectrum.
Identifiers
42834151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.