ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2026
Infection outcomes after primary inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in ambulatory and hospital outpatient settings: a single-surgeon descriptive cohort.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Device infection after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation typically mandates explantation and follows 1-3% of primary implants, a central concern as prosthetic surgery migrates to ambulatory surgery centers. We retrospectively studied all primary implantations by one surgeon while the practice operated an ambulatory program (October 2021-February 2024; the ambulatory program ended for non-clinical administrative reasons). Device, systemic prophylaxis, no-touch technique, and incision were identical between the ambulatory center and a contemporaneous hospital outpatient comparison; intraoperative irrigation was concordant between the ambulatory center and its principal hospital comparator but not across all hospital facilities. Device infection was defined as reoperation for infection within 90 days; reoperation at any interval was also screened. Of 547 primary implantations (ambulatory 218; hospital 329), no infections occurred in the ambulatory arm (0.00%, 95% confidence interval 0.00-1.68%); the hospital rate was 0.61% and the overall rate 0.37% (p = 0.52). Assignment to setting was not random, and the covariates ordinarily governing it - American Society of Anesthesiologists class, body mass index, anticoagulation, cardiopulmonary risk - were unavailable, so baseline risk cannot be assumed equal. With two events these data cannot establish non-inferiority or superiority; they characterize outcomes under one standardized protocol in two settings. These preliminary findings suggest that primary inflatable penile prosthesis implantation may be performed in an ambulatory setting without an apparent increase in infection risk when a standardized infection-prevention protocol is adopted; however, larger prospective studies are required.
Identifiers
42834142What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.