Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42834125›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2026

Interaction matrices as unifying tools for navigating ecological complexity.

J Christopher D Terry, Andrea Tabi, David García-Callejas, Virginia Domínguez-García

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J Christopher D Terry *Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. christopher.terry@biology.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0626-9938
Andrea Tabi *Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-1117
David García-Callejas *Institute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6982-476X
Virginia Domínguez-García *Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4591-4186

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung) FWF ESPRIT Award Esp-671EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (H2020 Excellent Science - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions) No 101064340Leverhulme Trust ECF-2022-666RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) UKRI4153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interaction matrices summarize pairwise species impacts within ecological communities into an analytically tractable format. Despite their contribution to linking subdisciplines and advancing our understanding of ecosystem dynamics, they have faced recurring criticism for oversimplifying ecological complexity. Extensions developed to address specific shortcomings often come with trade-offs, including increased data demands and analytical complexity. Here we review the foundations of the interaction matrix framework and examine the state of the art of approaches developed to tackle its challenges. We argue that the unifying role of interaction matrices could be improved by embracing, rather than fighting, their inherent nature as uncertain and transient abstractions. We explore how such an approach could bring substantial benefits and incorporate advances from wider complexity sciences. As we enter the second century of interaction matrices within ecology, such a shift will reinforce their place as a valuable tool to unlock the complex dynamics of ecological communities.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.