ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Toward patient-centered blood pressure monitoring: first evaluation of a low-pressure and rapid oscillometric method for reducing cuff-related measurement burden.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) monitoring is essential for hypertension management. Repeated cuff inflation may cause discomfort and reduce acceptance of out-of-office BP monitoring. To address this, we developed a novel low-pressure and rapid oscillometric method designed to reduce maximum cuff pressure (MaxCP) and measurement duration. In this participant-blinded crossover study, we evaluated cuff-related measurement burden using the Omron HEM-7290T, the first automated upper-arm BP monitor to use the novel method. The HEM-7290T was compared with an otherwise identical device using a conventional inflation-based method (Reference A; n = 110 participants) and with a conventional deflation-based oscillometric BP monitor (Reference B; n = 93 participants). The primary endpoint was the difference in visual analog scale (VAS) score for perceived cuff tightness. Compared with Reference A and Reference B, HEM-7290T reduced VAS scores by 8.6 points (95% CI, 6.5-10.8; p < 0.001) and 9.5 points (95% CI, 7.1-11.8; p < 0.001), respectively. Greater reductions in VAS scores were associated with more frequent selection of the HEM-7290T measurement as the one associated with the least perceived cuff tightness. Compared with Reference A and Reference B, respectively, MaxCP was reduced by 32.0 mmHg and 51.0 mmHg, while measurement duration was reduced by 6.8 s and 14.5 s. In conclusion, the novel low-pressure and rapid oscillometric method significantly reduced subjective and objective measures of cuff-related measurement burden, and measurements performed with the HEM-7290T were more frequently selected as involving the least cuff tightness than measurements performed using conventional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42834072What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.