Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42834041›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Benchmarking imputation methods on real-world clinical time series with simulated spatio-temporal missingness.

Niklas Giesa, Rustam Zhumagambetov, Maria Sekutowitcz, Sophie K Piper, Victor Sikora, Felix Balzer, Stefan Haufe, Sebastian D Boie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Niklas GiesaInstitute of Medical Informatics (IMI), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. niklas.giesa@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0808-3966
Rustam ZhumagambetovMathematical Modelling and Data Analysis Department, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8061-4904
Maria SekutowitczInstitute of Medical Informatics (IMI), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sophie K PiperInstitute of Medical Informatics (IMI), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0147-8992
Victor SikoraDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6554-2316
Felix Balzer *Institute of Medical Informatics (IMI), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan Haufe *Institute of Medical Informatics (IMI), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1470-9195
Sebastian D Boie *Institute of Medical Informatics (IMI), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7993-7901

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies evaluating imputation methods on clinical time series do not jointly account for spatial (e.g., across features) and temporal (across time) structures in missingness. We present a simulation model that induces realistic spatio-temporal missingness in three real-world clinical datasets by sampling from Markov chains. A variety of imputation methods including last observation carried forward (LOCF), linear interpolation, and spatio-temporal autoencoder (STAE) are applied to fill these missingness patterns. Finally, we evaluate the influence of time series imputations on a downstream prediction task. Here we show that deep STAEs outperform simpler baseline methods when missingness patterns lack spatio-temporal structure. In contrast, linear interpolations perform best on spatio-temporal patterns, contributing to sufficient downstream performances. This study demonstrates that simple linear imputations attain robust performances for clinical real-world data with spatio-temporal missingness. We provide an open benchmark to evaluate the effect of missingness on clinical studies and prediction tasks.

Identifiers

PMID42834041
PMCPMC13639038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.