ArticleNature communications2026
Benchmarking imputation methods on real-world clinical time series with simulated spatio-temporal missingness.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies evaluating imputation methods on clinical time series do not jointly account for spatial (e.g., across features) and temporal (across time) structures in missingness. We present a simulation model that induces realistic spatio-temporal missingness in three real-world clinical datasets by sampling from Markov chains. A variety of imputation methods including last observation carried forward (LOCF), linear interpolation, and spatio-temporal autoencoder (STAE) are applied to fill these missingness patterns. Finally, we evaluate the influence of time series imputations on a downstream prediction task. Here we show that deep STAEs outperform simpler baseline methods when missingness patterns lack spatio-temporal structure. In contrast, linear interpolations perform best on spatio-temporal patterns, contributing to sufficient downstream performances. This study demonstrates that simple linear imputations attain robust performances for clinical real-world data with spatio-temporal missingness. We provide an open benchmark to evaluate the effect of missingness on clinical studies and prediction tasks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.