Trial reportNature communications2026
First-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in unresectable advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: minimum 3-year survival follow-up of a randomized phase 3 trial (RATIONALE-306).
Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03783442 (A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Unresectable, Locally Advanced Recurrent or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RATIONALE-306 previously demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) in participants treated with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus those receiving placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, with a minimum follow-up of approximately 15 months. Exploratory long-term efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) analyses after 36.0 months' minimum follow-up are reported here. Patients (649) were randomized 1:1 to tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo with investigator-chosen chemotherapy. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy improves OS versus placebo plus chemotherapy in all patients (17.2 versus 10.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.80). At 3 years, 15.0% of patients treated with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy had not progressed versus 2.9% of those receiving placebo plus chemotherapy. No new safety signals have been identified. Median time to deterioration of physical functioning-a key QoL domain-has not been reached with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus 18.8 months with placebo plus chemotherapy. With longer follow-up, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy demonstrates long-lasting efficacy, tolerable safety, and favorable patient-reported outcomes, making it a suitable option for this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03783442 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.