ArticleBMJ open2026
"It's not necessarily science based": understanding organ utilisation decision-making in cardiothoracic transplantation in the UK through qualitative interviews.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study explores decision-making in organ transplantation. The number of patients waiting for a solid organ transplant continues to rise despite efforts to increase the available pool of donor organs. This has focused attention on maximising the number of organs offered that are subsequently transplanted, a process termed organ utilisation. There is a paucity of work exploring how clinicians decide to decline or accept offers of donor organs. This study aims to better understand the factors that influence organ utilisation decision-making in cardiac and thoracic transplantation through qualitative methods.
designSemi-structured qualitative interviews undertaken online over a 5-month period. Data collection and analysis occurred simultaneously. Transcripts were inductively analysed to generate themes.
settingClinicians representing all six adult UK cardiothoracic transplant centres.
participantsConsultant cardiothoracic transplantation surgeons (n=9) and cardiothoracic transplant coordinators (n=10).
results19 interviews were undertaken. The following themes pertinent to utilisation decision-making were identified:
conclusionsThis study is the first to explore the process of organ utilisation decision-making from a clinician's perspective through interviews. This documents an important and nuanced understanding of the interrelated factors involved in utilisation decision-making in practice. By providing evidence for the human inconsistencies in utilisation decision-making, this work may inform a more considered approach to strategies to improve utilisation rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.