Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42833722›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Psychosocial interventions for military personnel with PTSD: protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Ioannis Angelakis, Sarah Donegan, Karen Hughes, Laura Goodwin, Ffion Curtis, Alison Bryant, David Sparks, Michelle Maden, Anum Nisar, Thomas Spain and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ioannis AngelakisDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sarah DoneganDepartment of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Karen HughesPolicy and International Health, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Investment for Health and Well-being, Public Health Wales, Wrexham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-3395
Laura GoodwinDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Ffion CurtisLiverpool Reviews and Implementation Group (LRiG), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Alison BryantPatient and Public Involvement Contributor, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
David SparksDivision of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Michelle MadenLiverpool Reviews and Implementation Group (LRiG), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Anum NisarDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Thomas SpainDepartment of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ahmed WaqasDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK ahmed.waqas@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3772-194X
Catrin Tudur-SmithDepartment of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3051-1445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPost-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a serious mental health condition. It may develop following exposure to an extremely threatening event. Military personnel face an increased likelihood of developing PTSD because they sometimes bring experiences of difficult events from before they joined the military and because they have higher odds of being exposed to potentially traumatic events during service. To support the mental health of military personnel, several psychological interventions have been developed to help them manage PTSD symptoms. Although there is a lot of research demonstrating how well these interventions work, we do not know how the different interventions (eg, trauma-informed therapy, cognitive-behavioural therapy) compare. Because many of these interventions include more than one type of treatment (eg, behavioural activation), we do not know which specific component works best. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To explore these questions, we will identify previous studies that have examined interventions for PTSD in military personnel. We will then use network meta-analysis methods to make comparisons between all interventions, including some that have never been compared against each other in previous studies, to identify the best treatments. We also aim to identify which individual components are effective, even when delivered in combination. We will work with people with lived experiences, researchers, and mental health professionals to guide the project stages. Overall, this project aims to improve outcomes for military and ex-military personnel with PTSD by (1) identifying effective treatments, (2) establishing the relevance and transferability of the findings to a wider audience and (3) offering suggestions that will have immediate implications for clinical practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required as this study only involves a systematic review of published literature. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251081519.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelPsychosocial InterventionStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicNetwork Meta-AnalysisParticulate MatterStress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute

Identifiers

PMID42833722
PMCPMC13647000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.