ArticleBMJ open2026
Efficacy and safety of erythrocytapheresis in chronic mountain sickness: a randomised controlled trial protocol (ESCAPE-CMS).
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04557995 (Efficacy and Safety of Erythrocytapheresis in Chronic Mountain Sickness), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Erythrocytapheresis in Chronic Mountain Sickness: the ESCAPE-CMS Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic mountain sickness (CMS) is a clinical syndrome affecting more than 4 million individuals living at high altitudes, primarily characterised by excessive polycythaemia. Current CMS consensus recommends therapies targeting haematocrit (HCT), such as phlebotomy or isovolemic haemodilution. However, the clinical benefit of HCT-reduction strategies in CMS has yet to be established. This trial aims to evaluate whether erythrocytapheresis, regarded as one of the most precise and effective approaches for HCT-reduction, could improve clinical outcomes in patients with CMS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Efficacy and safety of erythrocytapheresis in chronic mountain sickness is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised controlled superiority trial with blinded outcome assessment. A total of 112 eligible CMS patients will be consecutively randomised to receive either standard care alone or standard care plus erythrocytapheresis with a 1:1 ratio. The primary efficacy endpoint is the net change in CMS symptom score assessed at 48 hours post-erythrocytapheresis or prior to discharge for controls. The primary safety outcome is treatment-related adverse events before discharge. The primary outcome will be analysed using an analysis of covariance, with a clinical threshold for superiority. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committees of the coordinating centre (Xinqiao Hospital, 2020-014-02) and each participating centre. Written informed consent will be acquired prior to enrolment. The trial results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04557995.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.