ArticleBMJ open2026
Diagnostic concordance of CXCR4-PET/CT and adrenal vein sampling in subtyping primary aldosteronism and its guiding value for percutaneous adrenal artery embolisation: a prospective diagnostic test accuracy study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrimary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common cause of secondary hypertension, and accurate differentiation between unilateral and bilateral disease is critical for selecting appropriate therapy. In patients undergoing adrenalectomy, histopathological classification based on the International Histopathology Consensus for Unilateral Primary Aldosteronism provides a definitive reference for unilateral disease. Although adrenal vein sampling (AVS) remains the diagnostic gold standard, it is invasive, technically demanding and often limited by variable success rates. CXCR4-targeted positron emission tomography (CXCR4-PET)/CT has emerged as a promising non-invasive imaging modality capable of identifying aldosterone-producing lesions, but robust prospective evidence comparing it directly with AVS is lacking. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CXCR4-PET/CT and to determine whether PET imaging can support treatment decision-making. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective single-centre diagnostic test accuracy study will enrol adults with confirmed PA and blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg. All participants will undergo adrenal CT, CXCR4-PET/CT and AVS following standardised protocols. Diagnostic accuracy will be evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve, using a hierarchical reference standard, with AVS as the primary clinical reference and postoperative histopathology (according to the International Histopathology Consensus for Unilateral Primary Aldosteronism). Eligible patients may receive superselective adrenal arterial embolisation (SAAE), adrenalectomy or medical therapy. Clinical and biochemical outcomes, including blood pressure, aldosterone-renin parameters and medication burden, will be assessed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Safety will be monitored and graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V.5.0 criteria. Multivariable analyses will explore predictors of unilateral disease and factors associated with PET-AVS discordance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: By integrating functional imaging, AVS, and treatment outcomes within a unified prospective framework, this study may provide comprehensive evaluations of CXCR4-PET/CT in PA to date. Findings may clarify its diagnostic utility, reduce dependence on AVS, and support precision treatment strategies in PA management. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2600118245.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.