ArticleBMJ open2026
Introducing the Moyo device for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring among women with high-risk pregnancies in a low-resource setting: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the effect of introducing the Moyo device for continuous intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring (FHRM) on the detection of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns and perinatal mortality.
designWe conducted a quasi-experimental quality improvement project using a before-and-after approach. During the preimplementation phase, intermittent FHRM was done using the existing standard of care (Pinard or a hand-held fetal Doppler). In the postimplementation phase, we introduced the Moyo device (Laerdal Global Health, Stavanger, Norway) for continuous intrapartum FHRM. We used the non-participant observation technique to collect data.
settingMbale Regional Referral Hospital in Eastern Uganda, 6 November 2023 to 17 August 2024.
participantsWe enrolled 1544 women with high-risk pregnancies. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was perinatal mortality, defined as death in labour and up to 24 hours postnatal. The secondary outcomes included detection of abnormal fetal heart rates, Apgar scores less than 7 at 1 and 5 min and mode of birth. We conducted generalised linear regression models of the binomial family with a log link and robust variance estimation.
resultsMortality preimplementation was 5.1%; following the introduction of the Moyo device, it fell to 3.2%, a non-statistically significant reduction of 37% (adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs): 0.63 (95% CI 0.39 to 1.02)). There was a 14.8% increase in the number of women whose fetal heart rate was monitored and documented during the postimplementation period (81.1% vs 95.9%) and detection of abnormal fetal heart rate was increased by 41% (aPR: 1.41 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.82)). The rate of caesarean section deliveries was similar in the preimplementation and postimplementation period (59.5% vs 63.1%, p=0.144). Newborn morbidities were lower in the postimplementation phase compared with the preimplementation phase: Apgar score <7 at 1 min (aPR: 0.67; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.85), Apgar score <7 at 5 min (aPR: 0.57; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.84), transfer of newborn to postnatal ward (aPR: 1.11; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.17), and transfer of newborn to the neonatal unit (aPR: 0.72; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.87).
conclusionsIntroduction of the Moyo device for continuous FHRM was associated with a reduction in perinatal morbidity among women with high-risk pregnancies. We recommend a stepped-wedge trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of scaling up the use of Moyo in lower-health facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.