Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42833709›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Introducing the Moyo device for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring among women with high-risk pregnancies in a low-resource setting: a quasi-experimental study.

Ritah Nantale, David Mukunya, Julius N Wandabwa, Agnes Napyo, Albert Ssesanga, Eunice Akello, Kenneth Tulya-Muhika Mugabe, Brenda Nambozo, Faith Oguttu, John Stephen Obbo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ritah NantaleDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda ritahclaire24@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8433-7054
David MukunyaDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3892-9777
Julius N WandabwaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Agnes NapyoDepartment of Nursing, Kabale University, Kabale, Uganda.
Albert SsesangaDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Eunice AkelloDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
Kenneth Tulya-Muhika MugabeAMANI-Accelerating Health Innovations, Mbale, Uganda.
Brenda NambozoAMANI-Accelerating Health Innovations, Mbale, Uganda.
Faith OguttuDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda.
John Stephen ObboDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mbale Regional Referral Hospital, Mbale, Eastern Region, Uganda.
Andrew WeeksDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Milton W MusabaAMANI-Accelerating Health Innovations, Mbale, Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4145-4044

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effect of introducing the Moyo device for continuous intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring (FHRM) on the detection of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns and perinatal mortality.

designWe conducted a quasi-experimental quality improvement project using a before-and-after approach. During the preimplementation phase, intermittent FHRM was done using the existing standard of care (Pinard or a hand-held fetal Doppler). In the postimplementation phase, we introduced the Moyo device (Laerdal Global Health, Stavanger, Norway) for continuous intrapartum FHRM. We used the non-participant observation technique to collect data.

settingMbale Regional Referral Hospital in Eastern Uganda, 6 November 2023 to 17 August 2024.

participantsWe enrolled 1544 women with high-risk pregnancies. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was perinatal mortality, defined as death in labour and up to 24 hours postnatal. The secondary outcomes included detection of abnormal fetal heart rates, Apgar scores less than 7 at 1 and 5 min and mode of birth. We conducted generalised linear regression models of the binomial family with a log link and robust variance estimation.

resultsMortality preimplementation was 5.1%; following the introduction of the Moyo device, it fell to 3.2%, a non-statistically significant reduction of 37% (adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs): 0.63 (95% CI 0.39 to 1.02)). There was a 14.8% increase in the number of women whose fetal heart rate was monitored and documented during the postimplementation period (81.1% vs 95.9%) and detection of abnormal fetal heart rate was increased by 41% (aPR: 1.41 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.82)). The rate of caesarean section deliveries was similar in the preimplementation and postimplementation period (59.5% vs 63.1%, p=0.144). Newborn morbidities were lower in the postimplementation phase compared with the preimplementation phase: Apgar score <7 at 1 min (aPR: 0.67; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.85), Apgar score <7 at 5 min (aPR: 0.57; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.84), transfer of newborn to postnatal ward (aPR: 1.11; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.17), and transfer of newborn to the neonatal unit (aPR: 0.72; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.87).

conclusionsIntroduction of the Moyo device for continuous FHRM was associated with a reduction in perinatal morbidity among women with high-risk pregnancies. We recommend a stepped-wedge trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of scaling up the use of Moyo in lower-health facilities.

Indexed as

CardiotocographyFetal MonitoringHeart Rate, FetalPregnancy, High-RiskAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPerinatal MortalityPregnancyQuality ImprovementResource-Limited SettingsUgandaHealth ServicesMaternal medicinePregnancyPregnant WomenPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID42833709
PMCPMC13646927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.