ArticleJMIR AI2026
From Episodic Checks to Continuous Clinical Monitoring: Nursing Policy Viewpoint on AI-Enabled Oral and Nutrition Risk Detection in Long-Term Care.
Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: Oral disease and malnutrition are common and closely linked problems in long-term care (LTC). Monthly weights, occasional diet reviews, and infrequent dental assessments can miss gradual decline. Recent tools, including computer-vision meal-intake estimation and smartphone-based gingival screening, create an opportunity for more timely clinical monitoring when limited data capture is embedded into routine care. This viewpoint proposes a nursing-led policy framework for AI-enabled oral and nutrition risk detection in nursing homes. The framework emphasizes protected oral health and nutrition champion roles, a practical 48-hour bedside assessment standard for high-priority operational alerts, standards-based electronic health record (EHR) integration, and prevention-oriented escalation pathways. We clarify that the proposed approach does not require a single black-box AI risk score. Instead, AI-derived measurements, such as estimated intake, plate-waste ratio, deviation from baseline, and image-based oral findings, can be combined with weight trends, EHR data, operational thresholds, and nurse review. The playbook specifies staged rollout, staff-facing alert outputs, fidelity checks for data capture, fallback documentation options for facilities with lower digital maturity, and key performance indicators for clinical outcomes, workflow burden, equity, and cost. Ethical safeguards include layered consent, minimum-necessary capture, opt-out recording, explainability for residents and proxies, and subgroup monitoring. AI-enabled clinical monitoring can support earlier action in LTC only if it is embedded in nursing workflows, auditable documentation, and accountable governance. Prospective, co-designed implementation studies are needed to test feasibility, workload, effectiveness, and equity across diverse LTC settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.