Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42832754›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2026

From Episodic Checks to Continuous Clinical Monitoring: Nursing Policy Viewpoint on AI-Enabled Oral and Nutrition Risk Detection in Long-Term Care.

Miya Aishima, Kazumi Kubota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Miya Aishima *Department of Nursing, Shimonoseki City University, Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5584-8541
Kazumi Kubota *Research Organization, Shimonoseki City University, 2-1-1 Daigaku-cho, Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi, 751-8510, Japan, 81 83-252-0288.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2270-2313

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: Oral disease and malnutrition are common and closely linked problems in long-term care (LTC). Monthly weights, occasional diet reviews, and infrequent dental assessments can miss gradual decline. Recent tools, including computer-vision meal-intake estimation and smartphone-based gingival screening, create an opportunity for more timely clinical monitoring when limited data capture is embedded into routine care. This viewpoint proposes a nursing-led policy framework for AI-enabled oral and nutrition risk detection in nursing homes. The framework emphasizes protected oral health and nutrition champion roles, a practical 48-hour bedside assessment standard for high-priority operational alerts, standards-based electronic health record (EHR) integration, and prevention-oriented escalation pathways. We clarify that the proposed approach does not require a single black-box AI risk score. Instead, AI-derived measurements, such as estimated intake, plate-waste ratio, deviation from baseline, and image-based oral findings, can be combined with weight trends, EHR data, operational thresholds, and nurse review. The playbook specifies staged rollout, staff-facing alert outputs, fidelity checks for data capture, fallback documentation options for facilities with lower digital maturity, and key performance indicators for clinical outcomes, workflow burden, equity, and cost. Ethical safeguards include layered consent, minimum-necessary capture, opt-out recording, explainability for residents and proxies, and subgroup monitoring. AI-enabled clinical monitoring can support earlier action in LTC only if it is embedded in nursing workflows, auditable documentation, and accountable governance. Prospective, co-designed implementation studies are needed to test feasibility, workload, effectiveness, and equity across diverse LTC settings.

Indexed as

AIartificial intelligencelong-term caremalnutritionnursingoral health

Identifiers

PMID42832754
PMCPMC13637977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.