ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Clinician Experiences With Tele-Emergency Care: Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emergency departments (EDs) face persistent challenges related to overcrowding, boarding, ambulatory care access barriers, and workforce strain, contributing to compromised patient care and high rates of physician burnout. Virtual care has emerged as a potential strategy to alleviate pressure on emergency care systems. In 2020, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) launched the national Tele-Emergency Care (TEC) program, in which patients who call a call center can be connected to an emergency medicine clinician by phone or video. Although virtual care may help address ED capacity and clinician burnout, the perspectives of emergency medicine-trained clinicians remain limited. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the experiences of emergency medicine clinicians participating in VA's TEC program. Methods: As part of a national mixed methods evaluation of TEC, we conducted semistructured interviews with clinicians delivering emergency care through TEC between February 2025 and June 2025. Participants (n=15) were recruited via multistage purposeful sampling from 4 of 18 regional TEC programs that varied in geography, volume, duration, and operational models. Interviews explored experiences of providing care in a virtual environment, including perceived benefits and challenges. We performed a descriptive qualitative analysis. Results: We interviewed 14 physicians and 1 nurse practitioner with formal emergency medicine training. Interviewees described four primary themes: (1) clinical decision-making in a virtual environment; (2) development of the provider-patient relationship; (3) clinician job satisfaction and professional well-being; and (4) challenges. Participants reported that TEC provided perceived opportunities to avoid ED referrals, more focused patient interactions, and improved job satisfaction related to flexible virtual shifts. Reported challenges included filling primary care gaps and performing care coordination tasks. Conclusions: TEC represents an emerging model of emergency care delivery that clinicians perceive may expand access, prevent avoidable ED visits, and support clinician well-being while also introducing distinct clinical and operational challenges. Our findings can inform the implementation of similar emergency telehealth services in other health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.