ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Robust prediction of drug combination side effects in realistic settings.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Side effects caused by drug combinations pose a major challenge in healthcare. Knowledge of these side effects is limited because often they are not detected in clinical trials, which typically involve a restricted number of participants and tested drug combinations. We introduce DCSE (Drug Combinations Side Effects), a novel machine learning method for predicting polypharmacy side effects. DCSE learns latent signatures for drugs, drug pairs, and side effects to predict the probability that a side effect occurs in a given drug combination. We first evaluate its performance in the commonly adopted experimental settings in the literature. However, these rely on balanced testing datasets and sampled negative examples, which do not capture the highly imbalanced and structured set of unknown side effects encountered in practice. Therefore, a key contribution of this paper is the introduction of more realistic experimental settings under prospective evaluations. Here, we attempt to predict side effects reported between 2009 and 2014 after training only on data available prior to that period. These evaluations include warm-start scenarios, in which some side effects are already known for a drug pair, and cold-start scenarios, in which the model predicts side effects for previously uncharacterized drug pairs. Our results indicate that DCSE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, demonstrating its robustness and efficacy in real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.