ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Bioactivity-driven prediction of antibacterial synergy using machine learning models.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationCombination therapies have demonstrated improved efficacy across diverse clinical settings. Predicting antibacterial drug synergy remains difficult due to strain variability and the limited scale of experimentally tested combinations. Existing machine-learning approaches for synergy prediction often rely on permissive cross-validation schemes that allow drug pairs to re-appear across folds, leading to inflated performance metrics. A rigorous evaluation framework and scalable feature representation are needed for robust generalization.
resultsWe assembled a curated dataset of 3,160 drug-pair-strain interactions covering 97 antibacterial compounds and 10 bacterial strains. We then developed HALO (Held-out Antibacterial interaction Learning from latent bioactivity Observations), a synergy-prediction framework in which each drug pair is encoded using multi-level Chemical Checker (CC) similarity features spanning chemical, targets, networks, cellular, and clinical bioactivity domains. Using strictly nested, drug-pair heldout cross validation with fold-internal feature selection, HALO achieved consistent generalization to unseen combinations (ROC-AUC = 0.78). Performance dropped notably under increasingly stringent heldout schemes and inflated under random data splits, underscoring the importance of rigorous evaluation for this task. Despite these conservative conditions, HALO transferred to two independent datasets, achieving ROC-AUC = 0.90 and 0.71 and average precision = 0.76 and 0.94 for distinguishing synergy from antagonism. Together, these results demonstrate that multi-level bioactivity signatures provide a scalable, interpretable basis for predicting antibacterial relationships, while clarifying the realistic performance limits of current models under truly leakage-free evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.