ArticlePloS one2026
Marital status and incident screen-positive cognitive impairment in a Taiwanese longitudinal cohort (2005-2016): Associations vary by cognitive screening instrument.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marital status has been associated with cognitive aging; however, whether such associations vary according to cognitive assessment modality remains unclear. This study examined whether associations between marital status and incident screen-positive cognitive impairment (MCI) differ by screening instrument and population subgroups in a large longitudinal cohort of community-dwelling older adults in Taiwan. We analyzed 103,863 adults aged ≥65 years from the Taipei City Elderly Health Examination Database (2005-2016). Cognitive status was assessed using the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ; 2005-2011) and the 8-item Ascertain Dementia questionnaire (AD8; 2012-2016). Baseline marital status was categorized as married, divorced, widowed, or never married. Cox proportional hazards models with time-updated covariates were fitted separately for each assessment period, adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, health, and lifestyle factors. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine potential reverse causation and variation in follow-up duration. Among 61,304 participants assessed during the SPMSQ period, never-married individuals had a higher risk of incident MCI compared with married individuals (hazard ratio [HR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.74). In contrast, among 42,559 participants assessed during the AD8 period, never-married status was associated with a lower risk of MCI (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.77). Effect modification by sex and age was observed across periods. Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent findings. Associations between marital status and incident MCI differed across assessment periods that varied in screening instrument, follow-up duration, and population composition; this measurement heterogeneity, rather than a confirmed temporal change, may account for the reversal observed among never-married participants. These findings suggest that interpretation of marital status-cognition associations should be considered alongside the measurement approach and study period under which they were derived.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.