Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42832549›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Cancer incidence in the Ecuadorian Amazon: A retrospective study (1990-2019).

Miguel San Sebastián, Osvaldo Fonseca-Rodriguez, Wilmer Tarupi, Sara Castel-Feced

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miguel San SebastiánDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-3510
Osvaldo Fonseca-RodriguezDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Wilmer TarupiQuito Cancer Registry, Sociedad de Lucha contra el Cáncer, SOLCA, Quito, Ecuador.
Sara Castel-FecedDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a scarcity of cancer studies in the Amazon region. This study aimed to analyse trends in cancer incidence within the Ecuadorian Amazon between 1990 and 2019, identifying the most prevalent cancer types and assessing their provincial and temporal distribution.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Quito population-based cancer registry, focusing on patients whose habitual residence was in the Amazonian provinces of Sucumbíos, Orellana, Napo, and Pastaza. Age- and sex-standardised incidence rates were calculated, employing Segi's world standard population as the reference.

resultsA total of 4,881 cancer cases were identified, revealing a 357% increase in the number of recorded cancer cases from the first to the last study period. Among men, the most common cancer types were stomach, prostate, and non-melanoma skin cancers, whereas in women, cervical, breast, and thyroid cancers predominated. Notably, there was a particularly high increase in prostate and breast cancer cases.

conclusionsThe findings indicate an important increase in recorded cancer cases and age-standardized incidence rates in the Ecuadorian Amazon, highlighting the urgent need to enhance healthcare infrastructure and cancer registry systems in the region. Targeted prevention and early detection programmes tailored to the specific needs of this population are urgently needed.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolEcuadorFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42832549
PMCPMC13637904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.