ArticlePloS one2026
The impact of the estrous cycle on the vaginal microbiota of dairy cows.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study investigated the vaginal microbiota of dairy cows throughout the estrous cycle and early gestation, under natural physiological conditions and without hormonal manipulation. Vaginal swabs were collected at estrus (D0), metestrus (D3), diestrus (D15), and Day 19 post-insemination (representing proestrus for non-pregnant cows or early gestation for pregnant cows). Pregnancy diagnosis was performed on day 31 post-insemination. Microbial characterization was performed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, followed by analyses of alpha- and beta-diversity, community composition, and differential abundance. Overall, the vaginal microbiota exhibited high inter-individual variability and only subtle shifts across reproductive phases. Beta diversity analysis revealed modest but significant compositional rearrangements between estrus vs. proestrus (strictly within the non-pregnant cohort) and estrus vs. diestrus. Differential abundance testing identified two taxa enriched during pregnancy (Muribaculum and Hoministercoradaptatus), indicating potential microbial biomarkers associated with the gestational environment. These findings demonstrate that, in naturally cycling cows, physiological hormonal oscillations induce only mild microbial changes, whereas individual factors appear to play a dominant role in shaping the vaginal community. The work contributes to defining baseline microbial patterns in non-manipulated animals and highlights the importance of distinguishing natural variation from hormonally induced effects in reproductive microbiome research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.