ArticlePloS one2026
Probabilistic health risk assessment of respirable dust exposure among stone carvers in Thailand using average daily dose and Monte Carlo simulation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respirable dust (RD) exposure represents a significant occupational health concern in stone processing settings, particularly among stone carvers who are at elevated risk due to high levels of dust generation. Prolonged exposure to RD is associated with serious adverse health outcomes, including lung cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the probabilistic risk associated with RD exposure using Monte Carlo simulation and to estimate the Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk (ILCR) among stone carvers. A cross-sectional study was conducted across five occupational categories: mining, cutting, splitting, knocking, and stone carving. Personal air sampling was performed in accordance with the NIOSH 7601 method to determine time-weighted average (TWA) RD concentrations. ILCR was estimated using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations, incorporating exposure parameters and health risk assessment models based on U.S. EPA guidelines. The mean RD concentrations did not exceed either the Thai occupational exposure limit (OEL) or the threshold limit value (TLV) in any of the five occupational categories, with the highest level observed among stone carvers (0.051 mg/m3). Although ILCR values for all groups were within the acceptable threshold of 1.00 × 10 -6, the highest mean ILCR was identified in the stone carving group (3.325 × 10 -7). These findings suggest that, despite being within acceptable limits, workers may still face potential health risks from RD exposure. The results underscore the need for strengthened regulatory enforcement and comprehensive control strategies, including engineering controls, respiratory protection, and targeted health education, to mitigate exposure and prevent silica-related diseases in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.