SynthesisPloS one2026
Educational and behavioural interventions for reducing fear of hypoglycaemia in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFear of hypoglycaemia (FoH) can interfere with diabetes self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Educational and behavioural interventions may address hypoglycaemia-related worry and avoidance, but evidence focused on adults with T2DM remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of structured educational and behavioural interventions on FoH in this population.
methodsNine databases were searched from inception to 31 December 2025 for randomised controlled trials of educational and behavioural interventions addressing FoH or FoH-related outcomes in adults with T2DM. Data were pooled using random-effects models, estimating standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Tau² and I², and a 95% prediction interval was estimated. Small-study effects and additional sensitivity analyses were examined. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2, and certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42025630957).
resultsEleven RCTs involving 1,096 participants were included. The exploratory pooled average effect favoured educational and behavioural interventions for reducing FoH (SMD = -1.89; 95% CI -2.54 to -1.25; p < 0.00001). Heterogeneity was substantial (Tau² = 1.10; I² = 95%), and the 95% prediction interval crossed the line of no effect (95% PI -4.34 to 0.56), suggesting that effects may differ across future similar studies. Funnel plot asymmetry and Egger's regression test suggested possible small-study effects. Trim-and-fill findings were estimator-dependent and suggested possible attenuation of the pooled estimate in exploratory analysis. The certainty of evidence was very low because of risk of bias, substantial heterogeneity, indirectness, and possible small-study effects.
conclusionVery low-certainty evidence suggests that structured educational and behavioural interventions may reduce FoH in adults with T2DM; however, the magnitude and generalisability of this effect remain uncertain. Further RCTs with standardised FoH measures, longer follow-up, and clearer reporting of intervention components and fidelity are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.